Mithrun of House Kerensil (
tablescraps) wrote in
netslum2023-09-19 12:09 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
un: Mithrun1 | Re: Digital Conference
There's a digital conference on September 23rd. We'll be able to ask CC Corp questions about the game and its anomalies.
How clearly they'll answer, I don't know. But it may be worthwhile to pool together everyone's observations, speculations, and complaints here. Different people have seen different things in Fragment, and not a lot of that information is consolidated.
If you've commented on the forums with your observations before, or seen a worthwhile comment, then you can re-link it.
For example, on the topic of the level cap armor:
• UTA's post (in-game NPCs' warning against using it)
• Zelkova's response (indicating the armor was not an intended feature, nor are titles)
• UTA's comment (in-game NPCs claiming only two individuals can "create things")
If you want to talk about something offline for whatever reason, DM me. I don't really mind sharing my number or email.
Edit:

How clearly they'll answer, I don't know. But it may be worthwhile to pool together everyone's observations, speculations, and complaints here. Different people have seen different things in Fragment, and not a lot of that information is consolidated.
If you've commented on the forums with your observations before, or seen a worthwhile comment, then you can re-link it.
For example, on the topic of the level cap armor:
• UTA's post (in-game NPCs' warning against using it)
• Zelkova's response (indicating the armor was not an intended feature, nor are titles)
• UTA's comment (in-game NPCs claiming only two individuals can "create things")
If you want to talk about something offline for whatever reason, DM me. I don't really mind sharing my number or email.
Edit:

no subject
no subject
has anyone heard from it since mithrun woke up though? dv gave him that weird dungeon right
no subject
no subject
a lot of people were upset
no subject
If he is troubled by backlash for whatever reason, then he's probably still speaking to individuals who weren't bothered by his prank; either what was done to me, or the effects of the glitches on other users. That, or individuals whom he can still speak cooperatively with, even if the glitches do bother them.
But that's only speculation.
no subject
but i guess they have their reasons
maybe pushing that too much is going to keep them in hiding
no subject
It's possible.
( He's closing the convo here because further discussion when they both know Barrett has spoken to DV (APPARENTLY!!!!) is going to cut it real close to how suspicious it'll come off. If he wants to actually talk about DV, he'll ask in person.
However, he doesn't know if he likes Barrett defending DV. He also doesn't like that if Barrett is speaking from any position of knowledge, then leaving the matter alone for awhile might be a better idea... but the idea is very difficult for Mithrun. He is either in do nothing or do something mode, and it's hard to idle in between. )